Pokémon Company Secures Settlement in Copycat Game Case

Mediated Settlement Reached with Chinese Developers Over Infringement

In a decisive move to safeguard its intellectual property, The Pokémon Company reached a mediated settlement with two Chinese developers—Guangzhou Maichi Network Technology and Khorgos Fangchi Network Technology—over the infringement of its iconic franchise. The settlement, announced on February 19, marks another milestone in The Pokémon Company’s unyielding efforts to protect its beloved characters and unique designs from unauthorized exploitation.

Background: The Pokémon Company's Unwavering Protection of Its IP

For decades, The Pokémon Company has built a robust global franchise that resonates with millions of fans worldwide. Recognizing the value and uniqueness of its intellectual properties, the company has consistently taken legal action against entities attempting to misuse its creative assets. In a statement emphasizing its commitment, The Pokémon Company affirmed that it would “continue to take all necessary steps to protect its intellectual properties, to enable its users worldwide to enjoy all Pokémon contents with complete peace of mind.”

This proactive approach has set the stage for several high-profile legal battles, ensuring that the franchise’s legacy remains untarnished by copycats or unauthorized adaptations. By defending its creations, The Pokémon Company reinforces the standards for intellectual property rights in the gaming industry.

The Copycat Mobile Game: Pocket Monster: Remake

The dispute centers on the mobile game Pocket Monster: Remake, a clear imitation of the original Pokémon series. Released in 2015 on Apple’s App Store and various Android marketplaces in China, the game shamelessly used character and creature designs that closely resembled those of the Pokémon franchise. Despite its blatant infringement, Pocket Monster: Remake quickly garnered financial success, reportedly earning over $40 million in revenue by 2016.

This unauthorized use of design elements not only misled consumers but also exploited the global popularity of Pokémon. The developers behind the game attempted to ride on the coattails of the franchise’s reputation, leading to significant financial and reputational damage for the rights holders.

Legal Proceedings: Lawsuit and Court Decisions

The legal battle intensified in 2022 when The Pokémon Company filed a lawsuit against six companies involved in the creation and distribution of Pocket Monster: Remake. The lawsuit sought over $72 million in damages and included a demand for a public apology, highlighting the severity of the infringement and its impact on the brand.

In September 2024, the Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court ruled in favor of The Pokémon Company, ordering the defendants to pay $15 million in damages. However, not all parties accepted the initial ruling, prompting Guangzhou Maichi Network Technology and Khorgos Fangchi Network Technology to appeal the decision. This appeal led to a follow-up hearing at the High People’s Court of Guangdong Province in December 2024.

During the hearing, the Chinese developers acknowledged their wrongdoing. In a joint statement, they admitted that Pocket Monster: Remake had “extensively used design elements of the well-known Pokémon video game series” and had engaged in acts constituting unfair competition. Their admission was coupled with a sincere apology to The Pokémon Company, other rights holders, and the vast number of players and consumers affected by their actions.

Settlement Details: Apology and Economic Impact

While the exact financial terms of the settlement were not disclosed publicly, the statement from the Chinese companies underscored the significant repercussions of their actions. They noted that they had incurred “a substantial economic price” and “significant reputational damage” as a result of the legal proceedings. The settlement not only secured a public apology for The Pokémon Company but also served as a stern reminder of the costs associated with intellectual property infringement.

The resolution of this case has broader implications for the industry, reinforcing the message that unauthorized copying and exploitation of well-known franchises will face severe legal consequences. The settlement stands as a testament to The Pokémon Company’s resolve in defending its brand and protecting its creative output.

Ongoing Disputes: The Palworld Patent Infringement Case

In a related development, The Pokémon Company’s legal battles are not yet over. The company is currently embroiled in a patent infringement case against Pocketpair, the developer behind the open-world survival game Palworld. The dispute centers on allegations that Palworld illegally mimicked patented mechanics similar to those used in the Pokémon series, specifically in the method of summoning creatures akin to Poké Balls.

In December 2024, Palworld released an update that significantly altered the way players summon their Pokémon-like “Pals.” This change is widely seen as a response to The Pokémon Company’s assertions regarding patent infringement. When approached for comment in January 2025, Pocketpair’s global community manager, John Buckley, declined to discuss the lawsuit further but confirmed that the developer would provide a detailed explanation of these changes to the player base in the near future.

Implications for the Gaming Industry

The outcomes of these legal proceedings underscore a critical message for developers and companies operating in the gaming industry: intellectual property rights are non-negotiable. The Pokémon Company’s aggressive stance not only protects its own creations but also sets a precedent for safeguarding innovative designs and ensuring fair competition. By holding infringing parties accountable, the company reinforces the importance of originality and respect for established brands.

As the industry continues to evolve, legal frameworks and enforcement mechanisms are expected to tighten, discouraging future attempts to capitalize on the success of iconic franchises. The ongoing cases involving Pocket Monster: Remake and Palworld serve as cautionary tales for developers worldwide, highlighting that the allure of quick profits cannot justify the breach of intellectual property laws.

A Landmark IP Victory for the Pokémon Company

The settlement between The Pokémon Company and the Chinese developers marks a significant victory in the realm of intellectual property protection. It illustrates the company’s commitment to maintaining the integrity of its brand and serves as a robust deterrent against future infringements. With further legal challenges on the horizon, including the case against Pocketpair, the gaming industry is watching closely as these landmark cases shape the standards for creativity, innovation, and fair competition in an increasingly competitive market.

Nipino.com is committed to providing you with accurate and genuine content. Let us know your opinion by clicking HERE.